Lovers Love









Scientific Studies | Homepage

Study Finds Romantic Comedies Can Take Fun Out of Real Relationships

Youve Got MailThe BBC reports that a study has found that watching romantic comedies can give viewers unrealistic expectations for real life relationships. The study involved student volunteers watching a romantic comedy.
The movies included You've Got Mail, Maid In Manhattan, The Wedding Planner and While You Were Sleeping.

The university's Dr Bjarne Holmes said: "Marriage counsellors often see couples who believe that sex should always be perfect, and if someone is meant to be with you then they will know what you want without you needing to communicate it.

"We now have some emerging evidence that suggests popular media play a role in perpetuating these ideas in people's minds.

"The problem is that while most of us know that the idea of a perfect relationship is unrealistic, some of us are still more influenced by media portrayals than we realise."
It would be interesting to see this study conducted on older subjects. Young people tend to be more idealistic and have less experience with relationships so it is possible romantic comedies have a bigger impact on them.

Posted on December 27, 2008
Permalink | Digg this | Blog links to this post: Google | Technorati | Comments (View) |



Study Finds Women Find Smart Men More Appealing

ITWire reports that a scientific study has found that women find smart and creative men more appealing.
Its authors—Mark D. Prokosch, Richard G. Coss, Joanna E. Scheib, and Shelley A. Blozis, from the Department of Psychology at the University of California, Davis-state in the abstract to their paper that, "Selecting a more intelligent mate often provides women with better access to resources and parental investment for offspring."

However, humans may have also evolved so that women look for intelligence in men in order to produce children that are physically superior-and, thus, use intelligence as a way to unconsciously determine the overall quality of her mate.

The California researchers studied the role of male intelligence with respect to the short-term and long-term preferences of women.
The study even found that for both short-flings and for marriage women prefered smart and creative guys. New Scientist says it is time for nerds to rejoice. The past couple decades have been good for geeks when it comes to wages so this could have something to do with women wanting smart, creative men. Or, they may have just had some smart women who took part in the study because seriously who doesn't want a smart and creative date?

Posted on October 5, 2008
Permalink | Digg this | Blog links to this post: Google | Technorati | Comments (View) |



Contraceptive Pill May Influence Women's Partner Choice

A new scientific study from the University of Liverpool found that the contraceptive pill may "disrupt women's natural ability to choose a partner genetically dissimilar to themselves." The disruption has to do with odor preferenes.
The research team analysed how the contraceptive pill affects odour preferences. One hundred women were asked to indicate their preferences on six male body odour samples, drawn from 97 volunteer samples, before and after initiating contraceptive pill use.

Craig Roberts, a Lecturer in Evolutionary Psychology who carried out the work in collaboration with the University of Newcastle, said: "The results showed that the preferences of women who began using the contraceptive pill shifted towards men with genetically similar odours.

"Not only could MHC-similarity in couples lead to fertility problems but it could ultimately lead to the breakdown of relationships when women stop using the contraceptive pill, as odour perception plays a significant role in maintaining attraction to partners."
That's an odd finding but an interesting one for women on the pill. How do you know the pill you are taking isn't influencing your decision?

Posted on September 15, 2008
Permalink | Digg this | Blog links to this post: Google | Technorati | Comments (View) |

Commitment Phobia a Genetic Flaw?

AVPR1A The BBC has a news report about a study that links a gene to reluctance to marry. This gene apparently affects an "important attachment hormone." The same gene has also been linked to autism.
Men with the 334 version of the AVPR1A gene earned lower scores from their partner/wife for strength of relationship bond. They were also less likely to be married.

If they were married, they were more likely to have experienced marital problems.

Having two copies of 334 doubled the chances that men would report having had a marital crisis in the past year.

It is thought that the gene, which was carried by 40% of the men, may affect the way the brain uses vasopressin.

The same gene has been linked with autism - a condition characterised by problems with social interaction.
Perhaps this will eventually lead to genetic testing. Girls interested in marriage may demand a genetic test before starting to date a guy, because they would want to date a guy with the AVPR1A gene. Or maybe women won't be able to resist dating the guy anyway to see if they can make him overcome his genetic reluctance to marry.

Posted on September 2, 2008
Permalink | Digg this | Blog links to this post: Google | Technorati | Comments (View) |

Dating Site Thinks Love is in Our Genes

GenePartnerIs love in our genes? A least one dating company think so. Techtree India reports that a Switzerland biotech firm named GenePartner wants to offer a DNA-matching service to dating sites.
Blind dating, random dating or speed dating - that's enough beating around the bush. According to a Switzerland-based biotech organization, people need online dating to get concrete and scientific answers.

The organization in question, GenePartner has announced a DNA-matching service and is looking to partner with dating sites. GenePartner will use a $199 DNA test, the cheapest on the web, for determining compatibility of prospective partners for a long-lasting relationship.

The company has derived the algorithm after analyzing "hundreds of couples". GenePartner will use a buccal swab kit to collect the DNA sample from the saliva of its members for DNA analysis. Alternatively, a GenePartner user can enter their GenePartnerID.
You can see the GenePartner website here.
At GenePartner we are dedicated to help you find your ideal life partner. Our formula is based on research on hundreds of couples and analyzes the pattern of genetic combinations found in successful relationships. Using this formula we will determine the probability for a satisfying and long-lasting romantic relationship between two people.

This probability is highest when two people are genetically compatible.
We aren't sure what "genetically compatible" means but it is an interesting theory. You don't the DNA to be too similar for obvious reasons.

Posted on July 22, 2008
Permalink | Digg this | Blog links to this post: Google | Technorati | Comments (View) |

Italian Scientists Claim They Found G Spot Using Ultrasound

The BBC reports that Italian scientists believe they can locate a woman's G spot using ultrasound. Dr Emmanuele Jannini, the leader of the research group, said, "For the first time, it is possible to determine by a simple, rapid and inexpensive method if a woman has got a G spot or not."
The latest research, published in the Journal of Sexual Medicine, was carried out the Dr Emmanuele Jannini at the University of L'Aquila, and involved just 20 women.

Ultrasound was used to measure the size and shape of the tissue beyond the "front" wall of the vagina, often suggested as the location of the G spot.

In the nine women who reported being able to achieve vaginal orgasm, the tissues between the vagina and the urethra - which carries urine out of the body - were on average thicker than in the 11 women who could not reach orgasm this way.
Other scientists disagree with Jannini's finding. They suggest that what he found isn't the G spot.
However, Dr Tim Spector, from St Thomas' Hospital in London, told New Scientist that the thicker tissue might actually be part of the clitoris - another extremely sensitive area.

Another suggestion was that, rather than being the cause of more orgasms, having these frequently might actually lead to better-developed musculature in this area.
Yet another scientist disagreed with the idea of trying to search for the so-called G spot in the first place. Dr Petra Boynton, a sexual psychologist at University College London, told the BBC, "If a woman spends all her time worrying about whether she is normal, or has a G spot or not, she will focus on just one area, and ignore everything else. It's telling people that there is a single, best way to have sex, which isn't the right thing to do."

Posted on March 7, 2008
Permalink | Digg this | Blog links to this post: Google | Technorati | Comments (View) |



Love is in the Ventral Tegmental Area

The WSJ's Sam Schechner reports (in the video below) on a study looking at the brains of people who have just fallen in compared to people who claim to have stayed madly in love for over a decade. The romantic love area of those who have just fallen in love occurs in a very primitive part of the brain - the ventral tegmental area (VTA). The activation levels of people who say they have been in love for ten years or more was the same as people who had only just fallen love so apparently some people do retain that "new love" experience. CNN has an article on love and the brain.



Posted on February 14, 2008
Permalink | Digg this | Blog links to this post: Google | Technorati | Comments (View) |

Study Finds May-December Romances Extends Human Lifespan

Xinhuanet reports on a study from PLoS ONE that suggests May-December romances may be boosting the life span of humans.
The study, published in the Aug. 29 issue of PLoS ONE, notes that while women often lose their reproductive capacity around age 50, men can often remain productive into their 70s. From an evolutionary perspective, women who can no longer reproduce are non-players, and since "it takes two," men partnered with menopausal women are also irrelevant.

More interesting, when old men father children, their genes seem to increase the lifespan of both sexes over evolutionary time.

Thus, Charles Darwin would say it's advantageous for males to live longer lives providing they can find a woman capable of reproducing. Natural selection should favor longevity-boosting genes, which would get passed down from fathers to both sons and daughters. So women would benefit as well in future generations, the scientists say.

"By increasing the survival of men you have a spillover effect on women because men pass their genes to children of both sexes," said study team member Cedric Puleston, a doctoral candidate at Stanford University.
As interesting as that is it really isn't increasing the human life span very significantly. What we really need are some terrific health breakthroughs and nanobots to boost our lifespan.

Posted on October 3, 2007
Permalink | Digg this | Blog links to this post: Google | Technorati | Comments (View) |

Study Finds Out Why People Have Sex

Researchers at the University of Texas at Austin have discovered that these are the four main factors why people want to have sex.
  • Physical reasons such as to reduce stress ("It seemed like good exercise"), feel pleasure ("It's exciting"), improve or expand experiences ("I was curious about sex"), and the physical desirability of their partner ("The person was a good dancer").
  • Goal-based reasons, including utilitarian or practical considerations ("I wanted to have a baby"), social status ("I wanted to be popular") and revenge ("I wanted to give someone else a sexually transmitted disease").
  • Emotional reasons such as love and commitment ("I wanted to feel connected") and expression ("I wanted to say 'thank you'").
  • Insecurity-based reasons, including self-esteem ("I wanted the attention"), a feeling of duty or pressure ("My partner kept insisting") and to guard a mate ("I wanted to keep my partner from straying").
  • Some of those reasons like "I wanted to give someone else a sexually transmitted disease" are quite frightening. The study found that there are "hundreds of varied and complex motivations" for wanting to engage in sexual activitiy that range from the "spiritual to the vengeful." People are complex and so their reasons for wanting sex are also complex. That really shouldn't surprise anyone but it is interesting that these researchers are trying to organize and understand it.

    Posted on July 31, 2007
    Permalink | Digg this | Blog links to this post: Google | Technorati | Comments (View) |

    Study: 4% of U.S. Adults Have Never Had Sex

    The AFP is reporting that a new CDC study has found that 4% of U.S. adults have never had sex. The study also found that 16% of adults had sex before the age of 15.
    Four percent of US adults have never had sex in their lives, and the figure climbs to 12 percent in the case of Mexican-Americans, according to an official survey out on Friday.

    "Approximately 96 percent of adults age 20-59 years have had sex, with the age group 20-29 having the lowest percent (91 percent)," the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) said in a report.

    Eighty-eight percent of Mexican-American adults have had sex, a lower percentage than any other ethnic group.

    The report also said 16 percent of adults first had sex before the age of 15, while 15 percent abstained from sex until age 21 or older.
    Another article the CDC's recent study of sexual activity found unsurprisingly that men have more sexual partners than women. 29% of U.S. men said they have had more than 15 sex partners.

    Posted on June 23, 2007
    Permalink | Digg this | Blog links to this post: Google | Technorati | Comments (View) |



    Mate Choice Copying

    If you are a women a new study suggests that your friends opinions can have a big influence on your love life. Match.com says the new study found your girlfriends can even sway your opinion on who you find attractive.
    You see someone across a crowded room... and your heart flutters. Sure, to a certain extent, it's because you like what you see. But while we might think we have a mind of our own when judging how attractive someone is, a new study reveals that women are heavily influenced by the opinions of others.

    To study this phenomenon, researchers at the University of Aberdeen in Scotland had female partners choose the more handsome out of pairs of male faces (the photos had been previously rated as being of equal attractiveness). Then, participants were shown a picture sequence in which each face was being looked at by another woman who was either smiling or appearing bored. When the initial test was repeated, the participants were more attracted to the faces that had been smiled at by others. This is called "mate choice copying" and is seen in many animal species such as guppies and finches.

    The moral of the story: Ladies, the next time you go out on the town and your friend says, "Ooh, he's cute!" or "I don't know what you see in that guy," take your pal's opinion with a grain of salt and try to tune into your own instincts. Otherwise, you might end up pursuing - or missing - a match who's right for you.
    If your friends aren't very good at selecting quality guys the above advice is probably good -- you don't want to follow the same mating habits as guppies and finches. Another idea would be to choose friends that have good taste. Then it isn't so bad if they help you make decisions.

    Posted on May 14, 2007
    Permalink | Digg this | Blog links to this post: Google | Technorati | Comments (View) |

    The Writers Write
    Lifestyle Network
    Bloggers Blog
    Crafters Craft
    Drivers Drive
    Fantasy SF Blog
    Gamers Game
    Health News Blog
    HowToWeb.com
    The IWJ Blog
    Lovers Love
    Media Cynic
    Petosphere
    Pleasant Morning Buzz
    Readers Read
    Science News Blog
    Shopping Blog
    Singers Sing
    Surfers Surf
    Traders Trade
    Video Nacho
    Watchers Watch
    Workers Work
    The Write News
    Writer's Blog





    www.loverslove.com

    Copyright © 2007-2010 by Writers Write, Inc. All Rights Reserved.